Wednesday, January 19, 2005
Ongoing Propaganda Campaign

Mass hypnosis in the Middle East
Hasan Abu Nimah & Ali Abunimah, The Electronic Intifada, 19 January 2005

(Graphic: Nigel Parry/EI)

The election that just took place in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip has been hailed as a great democratic achievement and breakthrough for the region. It is actually no more than a thin layer of light shaving foam which will soon be blown away by the strong winds of reality.

What explains the widespread readiness of various groups to lapse into hypnosis and euphoria about a non-existent "window of opportunity" for peace? Some parties have sought to assert their consistency by exaggerating this opportunity. Their enthusiasm about new Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas merely justifies their former insistence that the late Yasser Arafat had been the key obstacle to peace. Others are gullible victims of an ongoing propaganda campaign waged by Israel and its allies since the failed Camp David summit in July 2000 that the Israelis have been waiting only for the emergence of a "moderate" partner with whom to rush towards the desired peace.

Then there are those who adopt anything that holds promise for the Israeli line and embrace all developments that distract from Israel's actions on the ground. There are people too who believe that any activity — no matter how futile — will save them the embarrassment of cowardly inaction and shameful silence and some servants of power who simply want to jump on the bandwagon in case accidental, effortless progress gives them the chance to gain prestige or profit.

A growing group forms the hard core of the international peace process industry — those who have grown accustomed to living as parasites off other people's tragedies, basking in luxury and benefitting personally as they move endlessly from conference to meeting to seminar, shuttling from one capital city hotel to another extruding hand-wringing statements and "initiatives" in their wake. They "exhaust" their precious time supposedly in the service of other people's interests but demonstrate none of the honesty needed to confront the growing crisis caused by Israel's intransigence.

These factors and others account for the existence of the large, enthusiastic crowd who hail the new season of political manipulation and self-serving opportunism. A "moderate" is born and a peace settlement is at last knocking on the door. Unemployed Middle East envoys and their travel agents rejoice.

It is baffling and unsettling that so many people can so easily succumb to fantasy and deception, but this is the mesmerizing effect of propaganda combined with power.

As far as the Bush administration is concerned, it welcomes the engineered Abbas victory and believes, with the same dissociation from reality that drove Washington's plans for Iraq, that Abbas will be ready, willing and able to accomodate the full extent of Sharon's positions and that this could lead to a resolution to the conflict which avoids any need to put pressure on Israel and rids America of a troublesome burden.

The Europeans, whose perception of the situation is supposed to be fundamentally different, have now adopted wholesale the anti-Palestinian view of Bush-Sharon: that the problem lies on the Palestinian side and that cosmetic change at the top will somehow magically push change on the ground. Just look at the latest "contribution" to the peace process from the EU. Following an attack by Palestinian fighters on an Israeli army facility in the occupied Gaza Strip on 13 January, which killed several Israeli subcontractors of the occupation forces, the presidency of the EU, currently held by Luxembourg, issued a statement condemning the action as "terrorist" and offering "its sincere condolences to the Israeli government and the families of the victims."

By contrast, the EU presidency stayed absolutely silent when on January 4 Israeli occupation forces in Gaza killed seven Palestinian children with a tank shell, literally shredding their bodies to pieces according to eyewitnesses. Nor did the EU find it worthy of comment when the day following the Palestinian election, the Israeli army revealed a plan to demolish an additional 3,000 homes in Rafah refugee camp in southern Gaza. This activity has previously been condemned by Amnesty International and John Dugard, the UN's Special Rapporteur for the Occupied Palestinian Territories, as a "war crime." And none of the endless stream of EU envoys has found it worthy of comment that Israel's deputy defense minister, Ze'ev Boim, recently threatened to bombard Palestinian refugee camps in the Gaza Strip with artillery to punish civilians for harboring resistance fighters. Last year Mr. Boim speculated that violence by Palestinians was caused by a "genetic flaw."

Many others are too indifferent to take the mere responsibility of forming a position. They follow the easiest course: why should they be more royalist than the king?

But what does this charade offer the Israeli leadership and the Palestinian Authority?

It is hard to imagine that the Palestinian leadership is oblivious that the chances of any meaningful movement towards a settlement are nil. They may certainly take great comfort from positive comments on their choice of a likable leader, especially when such praise comes from great statesmen such as President Bush, who instantly opened the doors of the White House to Abbas. But they cannot be so naïve as to expect that Bush will retract his firm assurances to Israel that the facts Israel created in the occupied territories -- the ever-growing settlements -- are there to stay and that in accordance with Israel's desire to maintain Jewish ethnic dominance, Palestinian refugees will be banned from returning to their homes. Neither can the Palestinian leadership be naïve enough to think that from these extremist positions any peace agreement can be extracted.

They must know that Sharon, whose expansionist positions are enunciated to the global public, will not allow any Palestinian initiative to take off no matter how moderate, and Washington will not pressure Israel to do otherwise. They must know that Sharon will present the new PA leader with impossible demands, which if he ever miraculously manages to meet will be instantly followed by ever more onerous conditions.

Above all, the Palestinian Authority leaders must know that any possible agreement on the available Israeli-American terms will endanger their grip on power and therefore, contrary to what many may believe, it is in their keen interest to keep pushing it away.

If for PA leaders a bad agreement is hazardous because it exposes them to charges of selling out, so is stagnation, which would indicate inaction and failure. Therefore the ideal situation is a "peace process" which is all process and no peace, all promise but no fulfillment, fueled by aid money from the European Union and the United States. This allows the leaders to buy time and exercise the luxury of authority without any specific responsibility.

For this reason, the PA and the Fatah movement that dominates it rallied around Abbas, ganged up to discourage and intimidate any competition, and mobilized all their forces to protect their monopoly. With great political skill they succeeded in winning broad international support for their candidate by demonstrating their preparedness to end the Intifada and rid Israel of its most serious problem: Palestinian resistance to its ongoing aggression and occupation. These leaders seem prepared now, as they were at Oslo in 1993, to say and do whatever it takes to secure their position at the top.

Hence the Intifada is a problem not only for Israel but also for the PA. If the ideal situation for the PA is an open-ended peace process, it also needs to be one conducted without the bothersome fact of Palestinian resistance throwing it "off track."

What the Israelis and the PA have in common is that they see no urgency for a final settlement. The Israelis want time to complete the colonization of the West Bank, especially the huge tracts recently grabbed through construction of the apartheid wall. Israel wants no discussion of such final status issues as Jerusalem or refugees as long as there exists any slight chance that such issues might not be settled their way.

So the convenient alternative for both parties is the status quo accompanied by endless negotiations. The big difference of course is that while Israel is deferring to consolidate its gains, the PA is deferring to satisfy its desire for power. The people are left to fend for themselves.

Hasan Abu Nimah is the former permanent representative of Jordan at the United Nations. Ali Abunimah is co-founder of The Electronic Intifada and Electronic Iraq.


Posted at 09:57 am by R7fel
Make a comment  

Protect Babies from Abortion

Rock for Life Message to President Bush: Take Action to Protect Babies from Abortion

1/18/2005 9:48:00 AM


To: National Desk

Contact: Amber Matchen of American Life League, 540-903-9572 or amatchen@all.org; Web: http://www.rockforlife.org

WASHINGTON, Jan. 18 /U.S. Newswire/ -- At this year's presidential inauguration, American Life League's Rock for Life plans to serve as a silent voice for the millions of preborn babies killed by abortion. "Domestic terrorism continues to claim victims on President Bush's watch, as thousands of babies lose their lives to abortion in this country every day," said Erik Whittington, director of Rock for Life. "We will be along the parade route to encourage the president to use his power over the next four years to help bring an end to the pain and suffering that abortion brings."

"For several years, President Bush has issued proclamations for National Sanctity of Human Life Day," said Whittington. "It is time for the president to make a full commitment to the spirit of these proclamations and work tirelessly to bring an end to abortion on demand."

Thursday's peaceful presence will be the first of many Rock for Life events over the course of the next week marking the 32nd anniversary of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in this country. Many of the events will focus on getting young people involved and making their voices heard through activism and education. "America's young people really understand the harm that abortion does to babies and women, and are increasingly more pro-life than ever before."

Rock for Life youth will gather on the corner of Pennsylvania Ave., NW & 4th St., NW in front of the Canadian Embassy at 8 a.m. on Thursday. The students' peaceful, prayerful presence is aimed at sharing the truth about the tragic effects of abortion. "Our message is that we are tired of the killing of innocent babies and we want President Bush to take a real stand for life," said Whittington.

For more information, visit: http://www.rockforlife.org

WHAT:

Rock for Life peaceful, prayerful presence at the presidential inauguration

WHEN:

Thursday, Jan. 20 at 8 a.m.

WHERE:

Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. & 4th St., N.W., in front of the Canadian Embassy, Washington, D.C.

http://www.usnewswire.com/

-0-

/© 2005 U.S. Newswire 202-347-2770/


Posted at 12:33 am by R7fel
Make a comment  

Sunday, January 16, 2005
Peter Paul Rubens

Rubens show opens at the Met

 


By The Associated Press

January 14, 2005, 6:01 PM EST

Perhaps the person most surprised to see an exhibition of Peter Paul Rubens' drawings would have been Rubens himself.

The 17th-century artist famed for his portraits never made his numerous drawings public, instead using them as a personal visual archive and starting points for his huge painted canvases.

But a new exhibition of Rubens' drawings, many never before seen in the United States, offers viewers a unique look at an amazing talent and his artistic process.

"Peter Paul Rubens" opened Friday at the Metropolitan Museum of Art and runs through April 3. The show consists of more than 100 drawings taken from collections and museums all over the world.

"He's very known for his large canvases filled with voluptuous nudes, but here you see a different Rubens," said Michiel Plomp, one of the show's curators. "Most of his drawings, you never see them, (so) this is a really a once-in-a-lifetime experience."

Rubens (1577-1640) was a widely traveled and highly sought-after painter, working as an artist for the courts of nobility and even serving as a diplomat for Archduke Albert and Archduchess Isabella, the rulers of what was then the Southern Netherlands.

Drawings were a part of his artistic process from the beginning, the exhibit shows.

When he started his arts education as an adolescent, Rubens copied the well-known works of other artists. In Italy, where he lived from 1600-1608, he drew images from the classical sculpture he saw around him, as well as from the works of the greats like Michaelangelo and Titian.

So important were his drawings to Rubens, Plomp said, that the artist stipulated in his will that they couldn't be sold unless none of his sons or sons-in-law became artists and would benefit from them.

The Met show is organized both chronologically and thematically.

It groups Rubens' drawings in different ways -- including the composition sketches, which show his initial visions for his paintings, with pages covered with the same figure in different poses; his portraits, which he never really enjoyed doing but still executed with a certain liveliness and grace, including a portrait of one of his sons as a toddler, and landscape and animal drawings.

Even though Rubens considered himself a painter, his drawings are excellent in their detail and meticulousness, Plomp said.

"He's among the great draftsmen of the world," Plomp said.

"For our aesthetic of the 21st century, we appreciate his drawings better than his paintings ... he would have been shocked."

Copyright © 2005, Newsday, Inc.


Posted at 02:31 pm by R7fel
Make a comment  

Harry: It's a Mistake Not a Catastrophe

The world response to Prince Harry's Afrika Korps costume has been mad. It makes me fear for the sanity not of the Royal Family but of the British press.

Prince Harry is a 20-year-old private citizen. He is not a member of the British government nor of the diplomatic corps. He is not a head of state, nor even a head of state in waiting. He holds no public position or status, except as a very junior member of the Royal Family. The likelihood of his ever being king is, perhaps mercifully, slim. Nor did he don his costume on a public platform or at a public occasion. He was at a private party. That a member of the Royal Family should ever portray himself as a German soldier - even one assigned to a general who died opposing Hitler - may seem tasteless. But for goodness sake, so what?

Hypersensitivity to group feeling has now moved from political cult to raging obsession. It is being enshrined in a new anti-blasphemy law. I am sure that when I was at school I played Britons versus Nazis, not to mention cowboys and Indians, doctors and nurses and a variety of other politically incorrect games. That a soldier-to-be should dress up at a private function as an old enemy is hardly the end of the world. The former proprietor of The Daily Telegraph publicly idolised Napoleon. Is there a statute of limitation on dictatorship?

Prince Harry's action was tasteless and, once publicised, insensitive to those still living who suffered at the hands of the Nazis. I am sure a bevy of historical advisers would have recommended the Afrika Korps insignia but not the swastika.

No one supposes Prince Harry was "a Nazi". He was making no political statement. He was not portraying himself as anti-British, anti-Semitic or an advocate of Auschwitz or the Holocaust. He made an error of judgment both in his choice of regalia - the swastika is illegal in Germany - and in believing that any party is ever going to be private with him around.

But I repeat, so what? Such incidents become "issues" only when journalists choose to make them so. They telephone publicists and beg them for a critical quote. Once shaken, this cocktail needs nor further stirring. By today we had comments from the German embassy, the Israeli government, the European Union, the Conservative Party, survivors of Auschwitz, Uncle Tom Cobleigh and all. The story was leading every news agency worldwide. In the face of such hysteria, the prince's apology was considered not big enough. It did not pack the requisite news punch. There were demands for him to appear in person, possibly to scourge himself in public, do penance, stand in the stocks. Perhaps he should push a pea with his nose to Jerusalem.

We have lost the ability to express proportion. There is no longer such a thing as an accident. There is only a catastrophe. Whatever happens is "big news", unless something else turns up that is bigger. Someone somewhere, preferably a celebrity, must be involved, be blamed and, with luck, be sued or sacked. Public figures no longer make mistakes. They make "massive errors of judgment" for which they must resign or be roasted alive. This is almost medieval. However minor, and however sincerely regreted, a mistake may be redeemed only with trial by ordeal.

Der Spiegel's Matthias Matussek complains in today's Evening Standard that "it is the British who have a problem with Germany's past". Every day we run movies and old newsreel portraying the British as military victors and the Germans as beasts. We satirise the goosestep and treat the swastika as fancy dress. We depict Germans as a cross between our own lager louts and our own British National Party. Sixty per cent of our young people have never heard of Auschwitz.

This is wrong. But we do not help it by having hysterics when the "third in line to the throne" commits an error of judgment. Does this mean that, were he 30th in line, German battledress would be unexceptionable? We should all grow up. So in time will Prince Harry.


Posted at 01:58 pm by R7fel
Make a comment  

Trampling on History

Months of war that ruined centuries of history

Cherished monuments defaced and ancient inscribed fragments found in spoil heaps

Maev Kennedy
Saturday January 15, 2005
The Guardian


Iraqi authorities will today take back responsibility for the site of Babylon in a formal handover from the coalition forces. But what they will inherit, say experts, is a catalogue of disasters. According to the report of the British Museum's John Curtis, the site has been severely contaminated and parts have been irreparably damaged.

The report details:

· damage to the dragons decorating the Ishtar Gate, one of the world's most famous monuments, from attempts to prise out the relief-moulded bricks

· broken bricks inscribed with the name of Nebuchadnezzar lying in spoil heaps

· the original brick surface of the great processional route through the gate crushed by military vehicles

· fuel seeping from tanks into archaeological layers

· acres of the site levelled, covered with imported gravel - which Dr Curtis said would be impossible to remove without causing further damage - and sprayed with chemicals which are also seeping into the unexcavated buried deposits

· thousands of tonnes of archaeological material used to fill sandbags and mesh crates, and equally damaging, when that practice stopped, thousands more tonnes of material imported from outside the site, contaminating the site for archaeologists forever.

Babylon, capital of the Babylonian empire, site of the Tower of Babel and the Hanging Gardens of Babylon, one of the seven wonders of the ancient world, was rediscovered by archaeologists in the 19th century, but has inspired legends for thousands of years. It was the capital of two of the most famous kings of all time, Hammurabi, who ruled from 1792 to 1750BC, and introduced the world's first code of law, and Nebuchadnezzar, ruler from 604 to 562BC, who rebuilt and doubled the size of the city and built the hanging gardens.

Dr Curtis, head of the Department of the Ancient Near East at the British Museum, has worked as an archaeologist in Iraq for decades, and directed many excavations.

He was back in Baghdad in 2003 as soon as the bombs stopped falling, when the British Museum led the international effort to assess the damage and losses from the looted national museum. He returned to Babylon last month at the invitation of the Iraqi authorities, and inspected it with a team of Iraqi archaeologists. However, he was still not able to inspect the entire site, as part of it is still fenced off and mined.

He therefore warns - in what one archaeologist who has read the report described as "the killer phrase" - that his report "should not be seen as exhaustive, but is indicative of the types of damage caused".

The military camp was established by the American forces in April 2003, and damage was already visible when Dr Curtis first visited part of the site that June. The same contractors, Kellogg, Brown and Root - a subsidiary of the American civil engineering corporation Halliburton, of which the US vice-president, Dick Cheney, is a former chief executive officer - were used to develop and maintain the site throughout, as it grew to a 150-hectare camp, housing 2,000 soldiers. This was officially handed over to Polish forces in September 2003.

His 14-page report, which includes maps and was compiled during a site visit in December, lists dozens of examples of visible damage. In a walk through the ancient city he observes damage to:

The Ishtar Gate

One of the most famous monuments of antiquity. It was excavated in the 19th century by German teams; the upper glazed parts of the gate are in a Berlin museum. However, the monument was so important to the Babylonians that the foundations, deep underground and never visible in antiquity, were also decorated with beautifully modelled dragons and inscriptions. He reports 10 separate areas of damage to the moulded brick reliefs. "It has been suggested that most of the damage [to figures on the gate] was caused ... by a person or persons trying to remove a decorated brick," he says.

The "Warsaw" Gate

Two 20-metre long trenches have been dug here. "In the piles of spoil alongside the trenches there are many fragments of brick, some with inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar," the report says. One brick clearly has an inscription which reads: "Nebuchadnezzar, King of Babylon, who provides for Esagila and Ezadila, the el dest son of Nabopolassar, King of Babylon, am I."

The "Reno" gate

At one point, outside the base entrance nicknamed the "Reno Gate", he found a 200-metre stretch of road, lined with the mesh baskets "that have clearly been filled with deposits from the Babylon site, containing sherds, bones, etc."

The processional street

Two areas of 6th century BC brick pavement, part of the processional street, are exposed in this area. "In both cases the bricks are badly broken. This is thought to be the result of a heavy vehicle or vehicles driving over them. If this is so, it is likely that the bricks still covered by earth are similarly damaged."

The Ziggurat

Trenches have been dug into the ziggurat, one of the stepped pyramids which were one of the most distinctive Babylonian monuments and gave rise to the legend of the Tower of Babel. "Much pottery and many fragments of brick with cuneiform inscriptions of Nebuchadnezzar were observed in the bank of spoil" next to the trench.

Other observations include: an old car park vastly expanded to make a helicopter landing zone and parking lot, all flattened and gravelled, old tracks covered in new stones, now deeply rutted from heavy vehicles, large areas scooped out to a depth of two metres to obtain material to fill the sand bags and metal baskets and earth mounded up to protect six fuel depots, which also show evidence of leakage.

The most serious damage may be invisible, the contamination and disturbance of areas which have never been excavated, which may mean that many of the secrets of Babylon, including the site of the hanging gardens, may never be resolved.

In his conclusions Dr Curtis says: "A full-scale international investigation should be launched into the damage done to the archaeological site of Babylon during its occupation by coalition forces."

All mines and ordnance must be cleared, and all disturbed areas investigated and recorded by archaeologists appointed by the Iraqis, he says.

Babylon has never been on the Unesco list of world heritage sites. "Now more than ever Babylon needs the care, attention and advice that being a world heritage site would ensure it received," he says.

Dr Curtis said it was not possible for him to determine at which time, and by which forces, damage was caused: a separate report has been compiled by Polish archaeologists. A further report is being compiled by the Iraqis on the damage to Saddam Hussein's palace, built in a corner of the site, and which had already been looted before allied forces began camping out in the shell. The site had such symbolic importance to Saddam that he rebuilt many of the walls and gates, using bricks stamped with his name, many of which have been stolen.

Dr Curtis, back in his office in the British Museum, refused to say who should pay for the damage, but said: "The Iraqis simply do not have the resources to tackle the scale of this site, an international effort will clearly be needed."



Posted at 01:43 pm by R7fel
Make a comment  

Friday, January 14, 2005
Little Footprints In Our Heart


Posted at 09:12 pm by R7fel
Make a comment  

Reject Torture

 

logo.gif


 

Dear Felix

 

The Senate may vote on the Alberto Gonzales nomination for attorney general as early as the 21st of January!

 

Let's tell the U.S. Senate, and the world, that torture is not an American value.

 

 

1. Help place this TV ad in targeted states around the country on the 19th and 20th

 

2.  Join the coordinated national call-in day on the 18th 

 

3.   Forward this action alert to friends around the country.

 

 

As White House counsel, Alberto Gonzales forged legal opinions on torture and detainment that sought to permit the president of the United States to do an end-run around international law, U.S. law, good military conduct and common decency. Mr. Gonzales's involvement in the crafting of the infamous August 2002 "torture memo" that gave CIA interrogators the legal blessings to conduct torture, and his work on two presidential orders on detainee policy have provoked controversy and judicial reprimand during Bush's first term. Mr. Gonzales' role as architect of the Bush administration's policies on detention and torture makes him unfit for the job of Attorney General of the United States.

 

TV AD CAMPAIGN

 

In conjunction with MoveOn.org and Peace Action affiliates around the country, we will be running hard-hitting television ads in key states country next week encouraging public opposition and pressure on senators to vote against Gonzales.   To see the ad and make a donation to help get the ads on the air, please click here.

  

SENATE CALL-IN CAMPAIGN

 

On January 19, the Senate Judiciary Committee has scheduled a meeting likely to include a vote on the nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General. If the committee endorses the nomination, the full Senate could vote to confirm Gonzales as early as the afternoon of January 21.

 

On January 18, please join Peace Action members and concerned citizens across the United States for a National Call-in Day to the U.S. Senate (as you know, the House of Representatives does not vote on Cabinet appointments).  Call the Capitol Switchboard, 202.224.3121, and ask for your Senator or call your Senator's local office.  Tell your Senators that torture is not an American value and to vote against Alberto Gonzales!

 

Go to the Peace Action web page to download a flyer on the national call-in day to share with family, friends and neighbors. www.peace-action.org

 

Thank you for joining in telling the truth about Alberto Gonzales' role in Bush's torture scandal and urging our senators to reject torture.

 

Peace,

 

Kevin Martin

Executive Director


Posted at 08:49 pm by R7fel
Make a comment  

FYI

This is war
Thursday 13 January 2005 @ 09:57
http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0412/images/purplehearts/04_sam_ross2.jpg

Spc. Sam Ross, 21, combat engineer, 82nd Airborne Division, was injured May 18, 2003 in Baghdad when a bomb blew up during a munitions disposal operation. He is blind and an amputee. Photographed in the woods near his trailer where he lives alone in Dunbar Township, Pennsylvania October 19, 2003.

"I lost my left leg, just below the knee. Lost my eyesight, which is still unsettled about whether it will come back or not. I have shrapnel in pretty much every part of my body. Got my finger blown off. It don't work right. I had a hole blown through my right leg. Had 3 skin grafts to try and repair it. It's not too bad right now. It hurts a lot, that's about it. You know not really anything major. Just little things. I get headaches. I have a piece of shrapnel in my neck that came up through my vest and went into my throat and it's sitting behind my trachea, and when I swallow it kind of feels like I have a pill in my throat. Some stuff like that. And my left ear, it don't work either."

http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0412/images/purplehearts/07_luis_calderon1.jpg

Spc. Luis Calderon, 22, from Puerto Rico, a tank operator, 4th Infantry Division, was injured May 5, 2003 in Tikrit, when a concrete wall with Saddam's face on it, which he was ordered to destroy, came crashing down on his tank severing his spinal cord and leaving him a quadriplegic. Photographed at the Miami Veterans' Hospital December 17, 2003.

"I did my job. I got an Army Commendation medal. I didn't get a purple heart. I feel like I deserve one. It would make me more confident that I really did something. I'm disappointed that when they ask you to go, we go. And when we ask them where is our reward for doing something, they take their time. I don't know. I don't know how the system runs but it's pretty bad. For the moment right now, I just want to heal."

http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0412/images/purplehearts/10_alan_jermaine2.jpg

Pfc. Alan Jermaine Lewis, 23, a machine-gunner, 3rd Infantry Division was wounded July 16, 2003 on Highway 8 in Baghdad when the Humvee he was driving hit a land mine blowing off both legs, burning his face, and breaking his left arm in 6 places. He was delivering ice to other soldiers at the time. Photographed at home in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, November 23, 2003.

"I remember every detail about my legs. Every detail from the scars to the ingrown toenails to the birthmarks to the burn marks. I made it a habit even before I even joined the military, to cherish every part of my body, cause I would always look at it like, 'What if this finger was gone, would I be able to function without it?' Things like that I've always had on my mind. I don't know why, maybe it was God's way of preparing me for what was going to happen. I've been dealing with the military since I was a sophomore in high school. They came to the school like 6 times a year all military branches. They had a recruiting station like a block from our high school. It was just right there."

http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0412/images/purplehearts/12_randall_clunen2.jpg

PFC Randall Clunen, 19, 101st Airborne, stationed in Tal Afar, was pulling guard December 8, 2003 when a suicide bomber broke through security and exploded himself and his vehicle. Chunks of shrapnel ripped into Clunen's face. Photographed at home Salem, Ohio February 14, 2004.

"I have no political feelings. I'm just a soldier out there. You know, we're trying to help them live like us so they can be free and not be scared to do anything. Trying to set them free. That's how we looked at it. Sometimes we hated being over there because they just didn't respect what we were doing. We were trying to help them and they didn't want us there at all...It was a car bomb. A suicide bomber. He came just ripping through the gate and he exploded the car and himself. I got hit. My nose was sitting over here like on the left side of my face and I couldn't breathe so they had to cut a trache in. I was bleeding extremely bad. They kept me in a room by myself because I was just like really bad looking. I had tubes running all through."

http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0412/images/purplehearts/18_tyson_johnson2.jpg

Cpl Tyson Johnson III, 22, a mechanic with 205 Military Intelligence, was injured in a mortar attack on the Abu Ghraib prison in Baghdad on September 20, 2003. He suffered massive internal injuries and is 100 percent disabled. Photographed at home in Prichard, Alabama May 6, 2004.

"It was crazy. The Iraqis, they wake up about 5 in the morning and they walking like zombies, just walking, walking, like walking dead type junk. I'm serious. Most of my friends they were losing it out there. They would do anything to get out of there, do anything. I had one of my guys, he used to tell me -- my wife just had my son, I can't wait to get home and see him. And, you know, he died out there. He sure did and I have to think about that every day. Shrapnel down the back, shrapnel that came in and hit my head, punctured my lungs. I broke both of my arms. I lost a kidney. My intestines was messed up. They took an artery out of my left leg and put it into this right arm. They pretty much took my life. Pretty much."

Much more at the Purple Heart's gallery by Nina Berman.

This is war.

Posted at 12:28 pm by R7fel
Make a comment  

Tuesday, January 11, 2005
Distortion of Human Sexuality

HOMOSEXUAL UNIONS – WHAT A MESS!

by Jimmy Seghers

Polls show that most Americans and certainly most Christians are
opposed to elevating homosexual unions to the legal status of
marriage. Yet the aggressive agenda to promote legal status to
homosexual unions exposes the ineptitude of many Christians to
effectively articulate their opposition to this disturbing
development. How is that possible? The consistent teaching of the
Catholic Church has condemned homosexual acts "as acts of grave
depravity" that are "intrinsically disordered" (Catechism # 2357).
Furthermore, the Church has declared that the
homosexual "inclination" is "objectively disordered" (Catechism #
2358). The Church roots its lucid teaching in Sacred Scripture and
Tradition.

Protestants claim to base their beliefs on the Bible. Yet, the Bible
is very clear in its repudiation of homosexual acts (See: Gen 19:1-
29; Lev 18:22; Rom 1:24-27; 1 Cor 6:9-10; 1 Tim 1:10-11). Let's
consider two passages. In Leviticus God instructs the Hebrew people
through Moses: "You shall not lie with a male as with a women; it is
an abomination" (Lev 19:22). St. Paul's instruction is equally clear
and unambiguous: "Do you not know that the unrighteous will not
inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither the immoral,
nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the
greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor robbers will inherit the
kingdom of God" (1 Cor 6:9-10).

Some Christians have attempted to obstruct the clear biblical message
regarding homosexual acts through "reinterpretations" and "nuancing."
An example is found in Thomas A. Smith's article that appeared in the
September 20, 2003 issue of The Times-Picayune. Mr. Smith, who
teaches at Loyola in New Orleans, gives the following absurd
interpretation of the evil at Sodom and Gomorrah: "the real sin
identified in the story was a breach of the ancient social rules of
hospitality. . . The story has nothing whatever to say about
homosexual relationships as such." Evidently Mr. Smith believes God
destroyed Sodom, Gomorrah and the other three cities because they
were inhospitable not because "the men of Sodom, young and old" (Gen
19:4) attempted to commit homosexual rape upon their visitors. Aside
from this kind of silliness the message of Scripture is so clear that
the Rev. Rod Thomas, a spokesman for the evangelical network Reform,
noted that even the Lesbian and Gay Christian Movement accepted that
the Bible condemns all homosexuality activity.

Because the constant teaching of the Catholic Church and the clear
teaching of Sacred Scripture condemns homosexual acts, one would
expect that almost all Catholics and Protestants would stand shoulder
to shoulder in their repudiation of this disordered behavior. Sadly,
that is not the situation. Obviously there is confusion in the ranks.
In addition many Christians lack the ability to persuasively defend
their position even when they reject these acts. Let's consider two
factors that contribute to this ineptitude.

The Onslaught of Misinformation.

It is difficult to accurately gauge the considerable impact of the
long lasting and massive media blitz that promotes homosexuality in
television, in films, in novels, in textbooks - even some religious
textbooks, and in the class room. It's clear that this campaign has
been effective in fostering an increased acceptance of homosexual
behavior while spreading confusion about the causes and remedies of
these same-sex attractions. This propaganda uses humor, stereotypes,
misdirection, half truths, and falsehoods to portray the "normality"
of homosexuality and the bigotry of those who would question it.

In a letter to Catholic bishops psychiatrist and psychologist Dr.
Richard P. Fitzgibbons and Peter Rudegeair, specialists in the
origins and healing of same-sex attractions, observe: "For over
twenty years, activists, intent on changing the laws on sexual
orientation, have put forward a massive public relations campaign
specifically designed to spread misinformation that will change the
social acceptance of homosexuality." They sight the popularized myth
that scientific research has produced conclusive evidence that
homosexuality is a genetically inherited condition. They state
emphatically: "In fact, no such evidence exists."

Those who support this false claim sight the example of men who
exhibited extreme effeminacy from early childhood. This condition is
called Gender Identity Disorder (GID). Because of the considerable
observable difference between boys with GID and other boys, the
erroneous conclusion is drawn that boys with GID are born that way.
According to Fitzgibbons and Rudegeair the reality is that "effective
family therapy in which the father bonds more closely with the son
and affirms his son's masculinity can in a relatively short time
result in the elimination of these symptoms and the emergence of
normal boyish behavior." Because this information is not widely known
many boys with GID do not receive treatment with the result that
about 75% of these boys will develop a same-sex attraction in
adolescence.

In his attempt to justify homosexual relationships Rowan Williams,
the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, posed the question, "What
about those people who say "I've never known anything different'?"
Men and women with a same-sex attraction need to hear a clear answer.
There is real hope for healing! Based on their 25 years of experience
Fitzgibbons and Rudegeair affirm: "Large numbers of people, including
clergy, who had SSA [same-sex attraction] are now substantially
cured, especially if they brought the power of faith into the healing
process. These men and women no longer view themselves as being
homosexual."

There are many causes for same-sex attractions. Among them
Fitzgibbons and Rudegeair identify: 1) weak masculine identity among
males, 2) social isolation and loneliness, 3) peer rejection, 4) poor
body image, 5) the mistrust of male love in girls, 6) and a weak
feminine identity. They stress that children are born male or female,
but they must learn what it means to be a man or a woman. When
children fail to successfully pass through this vital developmental
stage, they may develop same-sex attractions in adolescence. Sadly,
there has been a huge campaign to hide this information from the
general public and from those who wish to prevent or to rid
themselves of same-sex attractions.

This is not meant to imply that the healing of a same-sex attraction
is easy for those who have already embraced the homosexual lifestyle.
Recent studies by Fergusson, Herrell, and Sandfort demonstrates that
individuals with same-sex attractions suffer from other psychological
problems at a substantially higher rate than those without this
disorder. Some of these are very difficult to treat. Anyone wishing
to learn more about this subject should read Fr. Harvey's book, The
Truth About Homosexuality, and the Catholic Medical Association's,
Homosexuality and Hope, which can be found at www.cathmed.org. Fr.
John Harvey, O.S.F.S. is the founder of Courage, a dynamic and
effective support organization for homosexuals. Unlike the dissident
group, Dignity, Courage accepts and promotes the Church's timeless
teaching on sexual morality.

The media gives the false message that homosexual unions are stable
loving relations just like the relationships of heterosexual married
couples. The overwhelming available data gives a very different and
dark picture. The study of Dutch homosexuals by Dr. Maria Xiridou of
the Amsterdam Municipal Health Services published in the May issue of
the journal AIDS found that men in homosexual relationships have an
average of eight partners a year outside their main partnership,
adding more evidence to the stereotype that homosexuals tend to be
promiscuous. Pete LaBarbara, senior policy analyst at Concerned Women
of America's Culture and Family Institute observed that these
findings are "proof positive that these relationships … will never be
as stable as a normal heterosexual relationship regardless of what
institutions and laws are changed." The study also discovered that
homosexual partnerships last, on average, only 1½ years. In contrast
the US National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) reports that 67%
of first marriages last 10 years and 50% last 20 years.

A lengthily article in the June 2003 issue of Population and
Development Review provided extensive data highlighting the
importance of traditional family and religious values. The authors,
Linda Waite and Evelyn Lehrer, state: "We argue that both marriage
and religiosity generally have far-reaching, positive effects." The
marriages that produce these desired effects are those who make a
lifetime commitment. In contrast divorce and cohabitation
significantly reduce the positive effects that were supported by five
pages of bibliographical references.

In spite of this growing body of information the Centers for Disease
Control granted over $500,000 to the radical sex promoters, Sexuality
Information and Education Council of the United States (SIECUS).
SIECUS is made up of a network of pro-abortion, pro-homosexual, and
feminist organizations. According to LifesiteNews.com/CWN, SIECUS
promotes sexual activities in schools and lobbies at state and
federal levels. Their "Guidelines for Comprehensive Sexuality
Education" include recommendations to teach 5 year-olds about
masturbation and homosexual practices.

The media's handling of the terrible priest scandal is a classic
example of misdirection. These reprehensible acts were incorrectly
identified as pedophilia. The sad reality is the vast majority of the
cases involved homosexual acts committed by homosexual men against
adolescent boys. Yet, when John Geoghan was recently murdered in
prison this crime was reported as a "hate crime," motivated
by "homophobia." Are we to believe that the Boston Globe and the New
York Times only discovered that Geoghan was a homosexual after he was
killed?

Admitting the true facts of the priest scandal does not imply that
most homosexuals are child molesters. However, it does highlight the
specific problem of homosexuals in the priesthood and the unique
obstacles the homosexual person experiences in integrating his
sexuality. The psychotherapist, Gregory Popchak, clarifies the
difficulty. "While the heterosexual person works out his identity in
public, eliciting the guidance of parents and others in his quest for
a whole identity, the shame the homosexual person experiences as he
confronts the disintegration of his sexual self causes him to wrestle
with many questions in secret, which grossly retards his sexual
development. Healthy identities – sexual identities in particular –
cannot be formed in secret."

Some politicians were quick curry favor with their radical supporters
by criticizing the insightful document from Congregation for the
Doctrine of the Faith, which gave needed clarity to the Church's
position on homosexual unions. Rep. Patrick J. Kennedy, son of Sen.
Edward Kennedy condemned the document as "bigotry." His distorted
logic went so far as to claim that the Church does not understand
what it means to be a Christian: "The very foundation of the Church
is about love. This notion of discrimination is so far afield of what
Jesus' life is all about." Using Kennedy's distorted logic one could
also justify fornication, adultery and a whole series of perversions.

Discrimination is the act of treating or judging a person unfairly
because the judgment is not based on the merit of the individual's
action. An example of discrimination would be giving a promotion
purely based on the person's sex, religion or race while passing over
more qualified candidates. In the case of homosexual acts and unions
the Church condemns the behavior precisely because it is evil. There
is nothing arbitrary about it. Behavior is the fair and objective
basis upon which all sinful actions are condemned. Jesus taught truth
and died defending it. Jesus was very severe in his condemnation of
those who pervert the truth. Those who speak of a saccharine Jesus
who tolerates anything should study tough covenantal courses Jesus
utters against the Scribes and Pharisees (Mt 23:13-36). In the words
of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith: "Those who would
move from tolerance to the legitimization of specific rights of
cohabiting homosexual persons need to be reminded that the approval
or legalization of evil is something far different from the
toleration of evil."

Kennedy is typical of those politicians who sell out their faith to
curry favor with radical groups who support evil agendas like
abortion and homosexuality. In their duplicity they attempt to hide
behind the falsehood that they can and must separate their public
behavior from ones private values. This rationalization evokes Pilate
washing his hands over his unjust sentence of Jesus. It should be
obvious to everyone that politicians have a grave moral obligation to
protect the good of society as a whole. Marriage is not given legal
recognition because it institutionalizes friendship or companionship.
Marriage has special rights because it provides a stable basis for
the survival of society, and the education and development of
children.

It should be self evident to any thinking person that two bulls are
not made for each other, neither are two cows. Even a rudimentary
grasp of human biology demonstrates that a man and a woman compliment
each other – not two men and not two women. So while persons of the
same sex may become close buddies and intimate friends that are not
capable of the conjugal dimension which is essential to the
procreation of children. Thus the Congregation for the doctrine of
the Faith draws the obvious conclusion: "Homosexual unions are
totally lacking in the biological and anthropological elements of
marriage and family which would be the basis, on the level of reason
[and one could add – common sense], for granting them legal
recognition. Such unions are not able to contribute in a proper way
to the procreation and survival of the human race."

The Holy See makes the astute observation that there is a huge
difference between homosexual acts as private behavior between two
individuals and the radical restructure of marriage and society by
recognizing these relationships as an approved institution in the
legal structure of a society. Clearly, it would lower moral values
making them subject to the fickle whims of what is currently
considered "politically correct." Clearly giving legal status to
homosexual unions would devalue marriage, which is the essential
building block of any society. Indeed, the very survival of a society
is rooted in the family and founded on marriage.

The Fast Track to Self-Destruction.

There is another dimension to the discussion that must be explored.
It is not possible to defend marriage or demonstrate the evil of
homosexual unions while sympathetic to other sexual sins. How can one
explain the immorality of homosexual unions while approving other
sinful behavior like contraception, pornography, masturbation,
adultery, fornication and abortion? How can one, for example, make a
convincing case against the homosexual excesses of Southern Decadence
while tolerating or excusing the heterosexual excesses of Mardi Gras?

One of the most insidious characteristic of sexual sins is their
ability to corrupt the mind. Ultimately, however, the guilt of
conscience forces a decision. Will I change my behavior to conform to
truth, which is called repentance; or will I twist and distort the
truth in an attempt to conform it to my behavior, which is called
rationalization? The great wound in Western societies today is the
moral hemorrhaging caused by unfaithful Christians who rationalize
their sins and reject the need of repentance. Regrettably, no
Christian church has been spared this evil.

Pope Paul VI warned about the dangers of this modern idolatry in
1966. "Today man is tempted to worship himself, to set himself up not
only as the highest choice of thought and as the goal of history but
even of all reality. He is ready to believe that he can of himself,
relying only on his own resources, make real progress and bring about
his own salvation. In other words, man is tempted to seek only his
own glory and not the glory of God… Today a falsely humanistic
mentality is becoming more and more widespread, a mentality deeply
rooted in egoism because it is closed to the knowledge and love of
God, and is basically unsettling because it is closed to His light
and to hope in Him."

What person has the right to decide which of the Ten Commandments are
no longer in effect? This cafeteria Christianity is simply another
attempt to be like God, knowing good and evil. We can choose to
abandon God's law, but we can't remove the feeling of guilt much less
its evil effect our own salvation. We can play the fool and live in a
fantasy, but the harsh reality of Christ's judgment strikes home at
the moment of death. . . if not before.

Many people board the fantasy train to hell with a ticket stamped:
the Sixth Commandment - violation. This leads to a pool of guilt
which contemporary false prophets - theologians, ministers, priests
and intellectuals - exploit to build their pathetic little empires by
handing out naughty permission slips. The price is cheap, just become
an ardent follower and you can sin to your hearts content. Sadly,
it's like counterfeit money. There is a lot of the stuff out there,
but it isn't worth anything.

The radical distortion of human sexuality, which the so-called sexual
revolution of the 1960's broke upon us with a vengeance of a
hurricane, is the root cause of the present confusion among
Christians about homosexual unions. The pervasiveness of sexual
excesses among Christians explains their ineffectiveness in combating
homosexuality.

Genuine human love desires to be a gift to another and to receive the
gift of another. This exchange of persons is beautifully expressed
with our bodies in the conjugal act in which the two become "one
flesh." This union only finds its true meaning in the lifetime
commitment of marriage. It is the path of self-donation and
surrender. Lust in contrast is distorted sexual desire that seeks to
use the other person as an object to selfishly gratify ones pleasure.
This is the path of grasping, taking and self-focus. Selfish men
commonly express lust is in the form of physical gratification while
exploiting a women. It is also common that women experience lust in
the form of emotional gratification while using a man. Each has made
an object of the other. Taking replaces the genuine gift of persons.

Selfishness is at the core of the sexual revolution, which seeks to
pull apart the inseparable love and fruitfulness elements of human
sexuality. Whenever self predominates commitment and self-sacrifice
diminishes or disappears altogether. In this context the life element
of the sexual act, the child, becomes the enemy because it demands
sacrifice. Contraception became the battleground in the Protestant
churches in the 1930's and in the Catholic Church in the 1960's,
because contraception prevents this unwanted life, this drag on ones
freedom and the imposition of ties and responsibilities. When
preventing the pregnancy fails, abortion became the method of choice
for eliminating the obligation to the child and each other. Forty
million murders later is it surprising that homosexual unions is now
a burning issue?

Christians will never win this battle by exclusively focusing on
homosexuality because, as bad as it is, it is a symptom of a deeper
malady – the distortion of human sexuality and marriage. Therefore,
the real challenge facing Christians is to rediscover the true
meaning of human sexuality and the sacrament of marriage. This is a
message our teetering society longs to hear and desperately needs.

Genuine human love is modeled after God's love. Within the divine
Trinity of Persons it is characterized by the infinite and total
donation of each of the Persons to the others. The concrete and
definitive example of this love is discovered in the Person of Jesus
Christ, the Heavenly Bridegroom. His is a love of complete giving,
total surrender, and absolute self-sacrifice. Jesus' sacrifice on the
cross for us is the model St. Paul uses to describe how husbands and
wives are to "be subject to one another" (Eph 5:21).

The biblical blessing of fertility in marriage is built on this
fundamental union between husband and wife because in the gift of
each other in procreation they reflect the inner life of the Trinity
and the relationship of Jesus and the Church. This explains the
satanic attacks aimed at this sacred union and the resulting culture
of death. Our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Cor 3:16;
6:19). Sexual sins desecrate that temple. In this way Satan, the
adulterous intruder, tries to steal what is not his.

The primary weapon that must be employed to win this battle to defend
marriage is the example of Christian marriages in which the husband
and wife love the way Jesus loves. Theirs must be a gift of self-
sacrificing love. There is no greater legacy to give children than a
mom and dad deeply in love, not the false love so sentimentality and
hormones, but the genuine article of commitment and self-donation.
None of us are capable of loving in this manner, but in relying of
Christ's potency we can be transformed to accomplish what is
otherwise beyond our capacity.

God's love is so totally wild that He makes Himself our gift in that
supernatural marital embrace we call the Eucharist. Why are we so
hesitant, so afraid to surrender to that gift? When we do our entire
life becomes a "Thank you," eucharistia in Greek – a eucharist. When
we eat ordinary food we absorb it into ourselves because we are of a
higher order than the food. However, Jesus is of an infinitely higher
order than we. So in the reception of the Eucharist, He transforms us
into Himself. Then we are prepared to become his sent ones (Mt 28:19-
20), the willing instruments through which he can transform our
world.

Posted at 07:36 pm by R7fel
Make a comment  

cont'd 'The Greatest Hoax. EVER!'

Chance Renders Evolution Impossible

"The probability of a single protein molecule being arranged by chance is, 1 in 10-161 power, using all the atoms on earth and allowing all the time since the world began...for a minimum set of required 239 protein molecules for the smallest theoretical life, the probability is, 1 in 10-119,879 power.  It would take, 10-119,879 power, years on average to get a set of such proteins.  That is 10-119,831 times the assumed age of the earth and is a figure with 119,831 zeros.
(Dr. James Coppege from, "The Farce of Evolution" page 71)

"The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40,000 nought's after it...It is big enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of Evolution.  There was no primeval soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random, they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence."
(Sir Fred Hoyle, highly respected British astronomer and mathematician)

"I could prove God statistically; take the human body alone; the chance that all the functions of the individual would just happen, is a statistical monstrosity."
(George Gallup, the famous statistician)

"The chance that higher life forms might have emerged through evolutionary processes is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the material therein.
(Sir Fred Hoyle, Highly respected British astronomer and mathematician)

"The probability for the chance of formation of the smallest, simplest form of living organism known is 1 to 10-340,000,000.  This number is 1 to 10 to the 340 millionth power!  The size of this figure is truly staggering, since there is only supposed to be approximately 10-80 (10 to the 80th power) electrons in the whole universe!"
(Professor Harold Morowitz)

"The occurrence of any event where the chances are beyond one in ten followed by 50 zeros is an event which we can state with certainty will never happen, no matter how much time is allotted and no matter how many conceivable opportunities could exist for the event to take place."
(Dr. Emile Borel, who discovered the laws of probability)

"The more statistically improbable a thing is, the less we can believe that it just happened by blind chance.  Superficially, the obvious alternative to chance is an intelligent Designer."
(Professor Richard Dawkins, an atheist)

"The only competing explanation for the order we all see in the biological world is the notion of special creation."
(Dr. Colin Patterson, evolutionist and senior Paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History, which houses 60 million fossils)

"To insist, even with Olympian assurance, that life appeared quite by chance and evolved in this fashion, is an unfounded supposition which I believe to be wrong and not in accordance with the facts."
(Dr. Pierre-Paul Grasse, University of Paris & past-president of French Academy of Science.)

"It is emphatically the case that life could not arise spontaneously in a primeval soup from its kind."
(Dr. A.E Wilder Smith, chemist and former evolutionist)

"The idea of spontaneous generation of life in its present form is therefore highly improbable even to the scale of the billions of years during which prebotic evolution occurred."
(Dr. Ilya Prigogine, Nobel Prize winner)

"The complexity of the simplest known type cell is so great that it is impossible to accept that such an object could have been thrown together by some kind of freakish, vastly improbable event.  Such an occurrence would be indistinguishable from a miracle."
(Dr. Michael Denton, molecular biochemist)

"The probability of life originating from accident is comparable to the probability of the unabridged dictionary resulting from an explosion in a printing shop."
(Dr. Edwin Conklin, evolutionist and professor of biology at Princeton University.)

"Hypothesis [evolution] based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts....These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without a murmur of protest."
(Sir Ernst Chan, Nobel Prize winner for developing penicillin)

"All of us who study the origin of life find that the more we look into it, the more we feel it is too complex to have evolved anywhere.  We all believe as an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter on this planet.  It is just that life's complexity is so great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did."
(Dr. Harold Urey, Nobel Prize winner)

"The world is too complicated in all parts and interconnections to be due to chance alone.  I am convinced that the existence of life with all its order in each of its organisms is simply too well put together.  Each part of a living thing depends on all its other parts to function.  How does each part know?  How is each part specified at conception?  The more one learns of biochemistry the more unbelievable it becomes unless there is some type of organizing principle---an architect."
(Scientist Allan Sandage)

"One may well find oneself beginning to doubt whether all this could conceivably be the product of an enormous lottery presided over by natural selection, blindly picking the rare winners from among numbers drawn at utter random.....nevertheless although the miracle of life stands "explained"  it does not strike us as any less miraculous.  As Francois Mauriac wrote,  "What this professor says is far more incredible than what we poor Christians believe."
(French Biochemist and Nobel Prize winner, Jacques Monod, "Chance and Necessity.")

"A further aspect I should like to discuss is what I call the practice of infinite escape clauses.  I believe we developed this practice to avoid facing the conclusion that the probability of self-reproducing state is zero.  This is what we must conclude from classical quantum mechanical principles as Wigner demonstrated"
(Sidney W. Fox, "The Origins of Pre-Biological Systems)

"In terms of their basic biochemical design....no living system can be thought of as being primitive or ancestral with respect to any other system, nor is there the slightest empirical hint of an evolutionary sequence among all the incredibly diverse cells on earth."
(Dr. Michael Denton, molecular biochemist)

"We have always underestimated the cell...The entire cell can be viewed as a factory that contains an elaborate network of interlocking assembly lines, each of which is composed of a set of large protein machines...Why do we call [them] machines?  Precisely because, like machines invented by humans to deal efficiently with the macroscopic world, these protein assemblies contain highly coordinated moving parts."
(Bruce Alberts, President, National; Academy of Sciences "The Cell as a Collectrion of Protein Machines," Cell 92, February 8, 1998)

"We should reject, as a matter of principle the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
(Biochemist, Franklin M. Harold "The Way of the Cell," page 205)

"Evolutionary biologists have been able to pretend to know how complex biological systems originated only because they treated them as black boxes.  Now that biochemists have opened the black boxes and seen what is inside, they know the Darwinian theory is just a story, not a scientific explanation."
(Professor Phillip E. Johnson)

"The simplicity that was once expected to be the foundation of life has proven to be a phantom; instead, systems of horrendous,  irreducible complexity inhabit the cellThe resulting realization that life was designed by an intelligence is a shock to us in the twentieth century who have gotten used to thinking of life as the result of simple natural laws.  But other centuries have had their shocks, and there is no reason to suppose that we should escape them.  Humanity has endured as the center of the heavens moved from the earth to beyond the sun,  as the history of life expanded to encompass long-dead reptiles, as the eternal universe proved mortal.  We will endure the opening of Darwin's Black box" 
(Michael j. Behe, Biochemist "Darwin's Black Box, pg. 252")

"An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to have been satisfied to get it going."
(Dr. Francis Crick, biochemist, Nobel Prize winner, Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature, pg. 88)

"Contrary to the popular notion that only creationism relies on the supernatural, evolutionism must as well, since the probabilities of random formation of life are so tiny as to require a 'miracle' for spontaneous generation tantamount to a theological argument."
(Dr. Chandra Wickramasinge, cited in, Creation vs Evolution, John Ankerberg, pg. 20.)

"Complex molecules that are essential to particular organisms often have such a vast information content as...to make the theory of evolution impossible."
(Bird, Origin of Species Revisited, Vol. 1, pg. 71)

"A close inspection discovers an empirical impossibility to be inherent in the idea of evolution."
(Dr. Nils Heribert-Nilsson, Swedish botanist and geneticist, English Summary of Synthetische Artbildung, pg. 1142-43, 1186.)




The Laws Of Thermodynamics

Second Law Of Thermodynamics:
The Second Law Of Thermodynamics basically means that everything runs inexorably from order to disorder and from complexity to decay.
The theory of biological evolution directly contradicts the Law of Entropy in that it describes a universe in which things run from chaos to complexity and order.  In evolution, atoms allegedly self-produce amino acids, amino acids auto-organize amoebas, amoebas turn into apes, and apes evolve into astronauts.

"If your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation."
(Sir Arthur Edington, Mathematician and Physicist)

"Since the laws of thermodynamics remain unquestioned, we know the total amount of energy available to do work in the universe is not self-replenishing, but is running out.  (We can assume that the total available energy in the universe is finite since current cosmological models suggest this state of affairs)  Furthermore, we see that work is still being accomplished in the universe at this moment, which means we have not yet exhausted our finite supply of available energy, then the amount of time the universe has to exhaust its available energy is finite. But if the universe eternally existed, then an infinite amount of time has already passed.  Infinite time would have consumed our universes finite time in the infinite past, there would not be enough time left in the finite time available to our universe to last through an infinite past.  Since we are still here, the universe could not have had an eternal past.  Therefore, the universe had a beginning and, thus, came into being." 
(Dr. David Berlinski)


Earth's Population Refutes Evolution

The evolutionary scientists who believe that man existed for over a million years have almost insurmountable problem.  Using the assumption of forty-three years for an average human generation, the population growth over a million years would produce 23,256 consecutive generations.  We calculate the expected population by starting with one couple one million years ago and use the same assumptions of a forty-three-year generation and 2.5 children per family......The evolutionary theory of a million years of growth would produce trillions x trillions x trillions of people that should be alive today on our planet.  To put this in perspective, this number is vastly greater than the total number of atoms in our vast universe.  If mankind had lived on earth for a million years, we should all be standing on enormously high mountains of bones from trillions of skeletons of those who had died in past generations.  However, despite the tremendous archaeological and scientific investigation in the last two centuries, the scientists have not found a fraction of the trillions of skeletons predicted by the theory of evolutionary scientists.


            

Evidence For Creation

1. The Fossil Record...Evolutionists have constructed the Geologic Column in order to illustrate the supposed progression of "primitive" life forms to "more complex" systems we observe today.  Yet, "since only a small percentage of the earth's surface obeys even a portion of the geologic column the claim of their having taken place to form a continuum of rock/life/time over the earth is therefore a fantastic and imaginative contrivance."  "The lack of transitional series cannot be explained as being due to the scarcity of material.  The deficiencies are real, they will never be filled."  This supposed column is actually saturated with "polystrate fossils" (fossils extending from one geologic layer to another) that tie all the layers to one time-frame. "To the unprejudiced, the fossil record of plants is in favor of special creation."

2. The Global Flood... The Biblical record clearly describes a global Flood during Noah's day.  Additionally, there are hundreds of Flood traditions handed down through cultures all over the world.  M.E. Clark and Henry Voss have demonstrated the scientific validity of such a Flood providing the sedimentary layering we see on every continent.   Secular scholars report very rapid sedimentation and periods of great carbonate deposition in earth's sedimentary layers...It is now possible to prove the historical reality of the Biblical Flood.

3. Population Statistics...World population growth rate in recent times is about 2% per year.  Practicable application of growth rate throughout human history would be about half that number.  Wars, disease, famine, etc. have wiped out approximately one third of the population on average every 82 years.  Starting with eight people, and applying these growth rates since the Flood of Noah's day (about 4500 years ago) would give a total human population at just under six billion people.  However, application on anevolutionary time scale runs into major difficulties. Starting with one "couple" just 41,000 years ago would give us a total population of 2 x 1089. 9 The universe does not have space to hold so many bodies.

4. Human Artifacts throughout the Geologic Column...Man-made artifacts - such as the hammer in Cretaceous rock, a human sandal print with trilobite in Cambrian rock, human footprints and a handprint in Cretaceous rock  point to the fact that all the supposed geologic periods actually occurred at the same time in the recent past.

5. Design in Living Systems...A living cell is so awesomely complex that its interdependent components stagger the imagination and defy evolutionary explanations.  A minimal cell contains over 60,000 proteins of 100 different configurations.  The chance of this assemblage occurring by chance is 1 in 10 4,478,296.

6. Design in the Human Brain...The human brain is the most complicated structure in the known universe.  It contains over 100 billion cells, each with over 50,000 neuron connections to other brain cells.  This structure receives over 100 million separate signals from the total human body every second. If we learned something new every second of our lives, it would take three million years to exhaust the capacity of the human brain.  In addition to conscious thought, people can actually reason, anticipate consequences, and devise plans - all without knowing they are doing so.





The Fraud Of Ape-Men

Piltdown Man: (Eoanthropus dawsoni)
These fossils were "doctored," the skull was stained with chemicals, the teeth were filled with material to change their appearance, and there were also file marks for the same purpose.  In 1953 it was formally announced a fake.

Peking Man:
It was conveniently discovered in China, just as Canadian physician Davidson Black was about to run out of funds for his evolutionary explorations in 1927.
The Rockefeller Foundation rewarded this discovery with a generous grant, permitting Black to continue digging.  This find consisted off bashed monkey skulls and some tools.  Monkey brains is a delicassey in some parts of the world.  It turns out that Peking man was dinner.
Professor Marcellin Boule was angry, "at having traveled halfway around the world to see a battered monkey skull."

Nebraska Man:
In 1922, a single tooth was discovered in Nebraska.  These experts said, "that it belonged to an ape-man."  By the time the story hit a London newspaper, not only was there a picture of  "Nebraska man" but there was also a picture of  "Nebraska mom."  All of this from a single tooth! 
Some time later an identical tooth was found by geologist Harold Cook, this time it was connected to a skull, the skull was connected to a skeleton of a wild pig.  How far will "science" go to "fit" fossils into their theory? 

Java Man: (Pithecanthropus erectus) (Homo erectus)
Eugene Dubios found these bones on the Dutch island of Java in 1891, it consisted of a skullcap, femur, and three teeth.  The femur was found 50 feet away from the skullcap a full year later.  Dubios also found two human skulls (Wadjak skulls) in close proximity to the original "finds."
The Selenka expedition which included 19 evolutionists was sent to prove the validity of Java Man.  Their 342 page report says, "beyond a peradventure of a doubt Java Man played no part in human evolution"

Heidelberg Man:
Built from a jawbone that was conceded by many to be quite human.

New Guinea Man:
Dates way back to 1970.  This species has been found in the region just north of Australia.



Neanderthal Man

Boxgrove Man:  Fully human

Neanderthal Man:  Fully human

Cro-Magnon Man:  Fully human

Homo Habillis:  Mixture of at least four different animals

Lucy:  Ape

"Detailed comparisons of Neanderthal skeletal remains with those of modern humans have shown that there is nothing in Neanderthal anatomy that conclusively indicates locomotor,  manipulative, intellectual or linguistic abilities inferior to those of modern humans"
(Erik Trinkaus, Natural history, vol. 87, pg 10. 1978)

Neanderthal Man buried his dead and had elaborate funeral customs that included arranging the body and covering it with flowers.  He made a variety of stone tools and worked with skins and leather.  There is evidence that he engaged in medical care.  Some specimens show evidence of survival to old age despite numerous wounds, broken bones, blindness and disease, this suggests that these individuals were cared for and nurtured by others who showed human compassion.
The bent posture of piltdown man has been traced to a bone deformity resulting from a vitamin deficiency cave dwellers experienced from lack of sunlight.


Questions And Answers With Professor Philip E. Johnson

Q:  Describe the premise and process of intelligent design?

A:  The premise of intelligent design is that the evidence of science, understood impartially, points to the need for intelligence.  This is shown in two particular ways.  First, there is the irreducible complexity of living organisms, like the biological cell.   This is best explained in the book "Darwin Black Box" by my friend and colleague, biochemist Michael Behe.  He shows the incredible complexity of each cell and the systems that are required many complex parts to work.  If you are missing one part, you don't get an almost perfect system; you get no system at all.  Any creative process would have to produce everything all at once.  The Darwinism says that you produce one thing that has some function, and then you add another one and another one and so on until you get the complete cell.  Each step is supposedly superior to the last.  But irreducible complexity makes that impossible.  That is the first feature.
The second feature of the living organisms is that they contain what is known as complex specific information.  To explain that, just think of a book like an encyclopedia or a computer program like Windows 98.  Computer programs don't write themselves; they need computer engineers.  A computer program has a very complex set on instructions.  Richard Dawkins, the arch Darwinist promoter and atheist, admits forthrightly that a single cell in the body has more information in it than all the volumes of the encyclopedia Britannica put together.  That information is what coordinates the activities of the cell.  Now, you know how impossible it would be to provide an encyclopedia by mixing letter at random until they come together in a certain way.
Neither of these things can be explained by the Darwinism theory.  They don't even try to explain them; all they do is huff and puff and bluff and say, "You're not allowed to challenge our scientific fact."  This dogma is not science at all.  None of it has been demonstrated by experiment, which is what would have to happen for it to be truly scientific.
(Conversation from, Decision magazine Volume 44, number 8, August 2003)

Q:  If there is no evidence for evolution, why do teachers continue to propagate it in our universities and schools?

A:  Most professors continue to teach evolution in the universities out of fear.  This fear is that of not being tenured, of not getting research grants, of not being published, and of not being accepted by their peers.  So to be accepted, to be published, to be granted research money, and to be tenured by their university, they must follow the party line, which is evolution.  This is how the academic game is played.
(Dr. Phillip E. Johnson, speaking at a conference.)

Posted at 09:18 am by R7fel
Make a comment  


Next Page




<< January 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01
02 03 04 05 06 07 08
09 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31




Click Here to sign the Darfur Petition!


-
R7fel1's Photos




-
papi and josh @ beach




-







If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:



rss feed